Security in the Contemporary World
Security in the Contemporary World — Study Notes
NCERT-aligned · 9 notes · 3 shown free
WHAT IS SECURITY?
ExplanationWHAT IS SECURITY?
Security fundamentally means freedom from threats that endanger human existence or the life of a country. However, not every threat qualifies as a security threat. If we consider every minor threat, such as the risk of stepping outside one's home, the concept of security would become too broad and unmanageable. Scholars of security therefore focus on threats that endanger 'core values'—those essential to the survival and integrity of a country or society. These core values typically include sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and the safety of citizens. The question arises: whose core values are we protecting? Is it the state’s, or the ordinary citizens'? Governments may have different priorities than their citizens. Additionally, the intensity of the threat matters. Security concerns are generally reserved for extremely dangerous threats that could irreparably damage these core values if left unaddressed. Security is thus a selective and context-dependent concept, varying across societies and historical periods. It is important to recognize that security is not a fixed idea but a slippery and evolving one, shaped by changing global and local conditions. To better understand security, it is useful to categorize its notions into two broad groups: traditional and non-traditional conceptions.
- Security means freedom from threats to core values essential for survival.
- Not all threats are security threats; only those that endanger core values intensely.
- Core values include sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and citizen safety.
- Security is context-dependent and varies across societies and historical periods.
- The concept of security can be divided into traditional and non-traditional notions.
- Governments and citizens may have differing views on what constitutes security.
- 📌 Security: Freedom from threats that endanger core values of a country or society.
- 📌 Core values: Essential principles such as sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity.
- 📌 Threat: Any danger that can potentially harm the core values.
TRADITIONAL NOTIONS: EXTERNAL
ExplanationTRADITIONAL NOTIONS: EXTERNAL
Traditional notions of security primarily focus on external military threats to a country. The core idea is that the greatest danger to a nation comes from other states that may threaten its sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity through military action. Such threats endanger not only the state but also the lives of ordinary citizens, as wars often target civilians to break their support for the conflict. Governments have three basic responses to military threats: surrender, deterrence, and defense. Surrender is rarely advertised as a policy. Deterrence involves preventing attacks by raising the costs of war to unacceptable levels for the adversary. Defense is the act of protecting the country when war breaks out, aiming to deny the attacker’s objectives and defeat their forces. Traditional security policy also includes the concept of balance of power, where states monitor the relative strength of other countries to anticipate potential threats. Maintaining a favorable balance often involves building military, economic, and technological power. Another key element is alliance building, where states form coalitions to deter or defend against military attacks. Alliances are based on national interests and can shift as interests change. For example, the US supported Islamic militants against the Soviet Union in the 1980s but later fought against groups like Al Qaeda after terrorist attacks on American soil. Traditional security views the international system as anarchic, lacking a central authority above states, making self-reliance essential for security.
- Traditional security focuses on military threats from other states.
- Core values threatened include sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity.
- Governments respond by surrender, deterrence (raising war costs), or defense.
- Balance of power involves monitoring and maintaining relative strength among states.
- Alliance building forms coalitions to deter or defend against attacks.
- International system lacks central authority; states are responsible for their own security.
- 📌 Deterrence: Strategy to prevent attack by threatening unacceptable retaliation.
- 📌 Defense: Military action to repel an attack and protect national interests.
- 📌 Balance of Power: Distribution of power among states to prevent dominance by any one.
TRADITIONAL NOTIONS: INTERNAL
ExplanationTRADITIONAL NOTIONS: INTERNAL
Internal security concerns the maintenance of peace and order within a country's borders. Although traditional security focuses more on external military threats, internal security is crucial because a country cannot face external threats effectively
Practice Questions — Security in the Contemporary World
Includes NCERT exercise questions with answers
Q1.1. Match the terms with their meaning: i. Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) ii. Arms Control iii. Alliance iv. Disarmament a. Giving up certain types of weapons b. A process of exchanging information on defence matters between nations on a regular basis c. A coalition of nations meant to deter or defend against military attacks d. Regulates the acquisition or development of weapons
Answer:
i - b: Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) are a process of exchanging information on defence matters between nations on a regular basis. ii - d: Arms Control regulates the acquisition or development of weapons. iii - c: Alliance is a coalition of nations meant to deter or defend against military attacks. iv - a: Disarmament means giving up certain types of weapons.
Explanation:
Each term is matched with its definition based on their established meanings in international relations: - CBMs involve sharing defence information to build trust. - Arms Control limits weapon development/acquisition. - Alliance is a group of nations for mutual defence. - Disarmament is the act of giving up weapons.
Q2.2. Which among the following would you consider as a traditional security concern / non-traditional security concern / not a threat? a. The spread of chikungunya / dengue fever b. Inflow of workers from a neighbouring nation c. Emergence of a group demanding nationhood for their region d. Emergence of a group demanding autonomy for their region e. A newspaper that is critical of the armed forces in the country
Answer:
a. The spread of chikungunya / dengue fever - Non-traditional security concern (health-related threat). b. Inflow of workers from a neighbouring nation - Not a threat (migration issue, generally not a security threat). c. Emergence of a group demanding nationhood for their region - Traditional security concern (potential threat to territorial integrity). d. Emergence of a group demanding autonomy for their region - Traditional security concern (internal political threat). e. A newspaper that is critical of the armed forces in the country - Not a threat (freedom of press, democratic right).
Explanation:
Traditional security concerns relate to military and territorial threats, such as groups demanding nationhood or autonomy which can lead to conflict. Non-traditional concerns include health epidemics like chikungunya/dengue. Inflow of workers and critical newspapers are generally not considered security threats.
Q3.3. What is the difference between traditional and non-traditional security? Which category would the creation and sustenance of alliances belong to?
Answer:
Traditional security refers to protection against military threats, territorial invasions, and conflicts between states. It focuses on safeguarding the sovereignty and physical integrity of a nation. Non-traditional security includes threats that are not military in nature, such as environmental degradation, pandemics, economic instability, and terrorism. The creation and sustenance of alliances belong to traditional security as they are primarily formed to deter or defend against military attacks.
Explanation:
Traditional security deals with state-centric military threats, while non-traditional security covers broader issues affecting human and national security. Alliances are strategic military partnerships, thus part of traditional security.
Q4.4. What are the differences in the threats that people in the Third World face and those living in the First World face?
Answer:
People in the Third World face threats such as poverty, underdevelopment, political instability, insurgency, and lack of basic resources, which are often non-traditional security threats. People in the First World mainly face traditional security threats like military conflicts, terrorism, and also non-traditional threats such as cyber security and environmental issues but generally have better resources to manage them.
Explanation:
Third World countries often struggle with internal conflicts, economic deprivation, and social issues affecting security. First World countries have stronger institutions and face more external military or technological threats.
Q5.5. Is terrorism a traditional or non-traditional threat to security?
Answer:
Terrorism is considered a non-traditional threat to security because it involves non-state actors using violence to create fear and disrupt societies, rather than conventional military conflict between states.
Explanation:
Traditional security threats involve state-based military conflicts, whereas terrorism is carried out by non-state groups and affects civilian populations, fitting the non-traditional category.
Q6.6. What are the choices available to a state when its security is threatened, according to the traditional security perspective?
Answer:
According to the traditional security perspective, a state can: - Build up its military strength (arms race) - Form alliances with other states - Engage in diplomacy to resolve conflicts - Use deterrence strategies such as nuclear weapons - Prepare for war or defense - Seek balance of power to prevent dominance by any one state
Explanation:
Traditional security focuses on military and strategic options to counter threats, including alliances and deterrence to maintain sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Q7.7. What is 'Balance of Power'? How could a state achieve this?
Answer:
Balance of Power is a situation in international relations where no single state or alliance is strong enough to dominate others, thus maintaining stability and preventing conflict. A state can achieve this by building its own military capabilities, forming alliances, and engaging in diplomacy to counterbalance the power of rival states.
Explanation:
By ensuring that power is distributed so that no one state becomes overwhelmingly strong, states maintain peace and security through deterrence.
Q8.8. What are the objectives of military alliances? Give an example of a functioning military alliance with its specific objectives.
Answer:
Objectives of military alliances include: - Collective defense against external aggression - Deterrence of potential adversaries - Sharing military resources and intelligence - Enhancing security through cooperation Example: NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) aims to provide collective defense where an attack against one member is considered an attack against all, deterring aggression primarily during the Cold War and continuing to maintain security among member states.
Explanation:
Military alliances strengthen security by pooling resources and presenting a united front against threats.
All 7 Chapters in Contemporary World Politics
Political Science · Class 12