Constitution as a Living Document | Class 11 Political Science Notes
By ConceptScroll Team · Published on 17 July 2026 · 2 min read

Constitution as a Living Document – this guide gives you a concise, exam-ready overview of Constitution as a Living Document from Class 11 Political Science, written by ConceptScroll editors and reviewed against the latest NCERT textbook.
HOW TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION?
This section details the procedure for amending the Indian Constitution as laid down in Article 368. The Constitution is designed to be both flexible and rigid: flexible enough to allow necessary changes but rigid enough to prevent frequent or unnecessary amendments. Some parts of the Constitution can be amended by a simple law of Parliament without special procedures, such as admitting new states or altering state boundaries (Articles 2 and 3). However, most amendments require a special procedure under Article 368, which involves either a special majority in both Houses of Parliament or a special majority plus ratification by at least half of the State legislatures. The President's assent is mandatory but the President cannot return the amendment bill for reconsideration. This process ensures that only elected representatives have the authority to amend the Constitution, emphasizing parliamentary sovereignty while protecting federal principles and the Constitution's core features.
📊 Diagram: See figure_4: I don't understand how a constitution can be flexible or rigid. Isn't it the politics of that period which makes the constitution rigid or flexible?; See figure_5: Reprint 2026-27; See figure_6: What happens if some States want an amendment to the Constitution? Can't they propose an amendment? I think this is another example of favouring the centre against the States!
🔗 Connection: Introduces the concept of special majority required for constitutional amendments.
Frequently asked questions
Constitution as a living document implies that:
d. It's static.
Which of the following statements is not true?
a. In the Minerva Mills case (1980) Supreme Court repeated the basic structure doctrine.
Which constitutional amendments brought down the minimum age for voting from 21 to 18 years?
c. 61st amendment
Which of the following statements is not correct with respect to the Supreme Court ruling in the Keshvananda Bharati case?
d. By Keshvanand Bharti ruling parliament got absolute power to amend any part of the constitution.
Ready to ace this chapter?
Get the full Constitution as a Living Document chapter — interactive notes, diagrams, worked solutions, polls and a free practice quiz — in the ConceptScroll app.
Study smarter with ConceptScroll
Daily NCERT-aligned reels, AI doubt solving and chapter quizzes — all free.
Start learning freeContinue reading
- धर्मनिरपेक्षता | Class 11 Political Science Notes
Clear NCERT-aligned notes on धर्मनिरपेक्षता for Class 11 Political Science.
- धर्मनिरपेक्षता | Class 11 Political Science Notes
Clear NCERT-aligned notes on धर्मनिरपेक्षता for Class 11 Political Science.
- धर्मनिरपेक्षता | Class 11 Political Science Notes
Clear NCERT-aligned notes on धर्मनिरपेक्षता for Class 11 Political Science.